Bangladesh Supreme Court asks govt to maintain status quo on Rajuk’s Purbanchal project work


The Appellate Division on Monday asked Rajdhani Unnayan Kartiripakkha to maintain status quo on the land development or monetary work for Purbachal housing project in Gazipur.
A five-member bench headed by Chief Justice Md. Muzammel Hossain passed the order after hearing a petition filed by Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association seeking withdrawal of its previous order that had stayed a High Court order suspending development of the project.
The Appellate Division also assigned a High Court bench, headed by Justice M Moazzam Husain, to dispose of the writ petition involving Purbachal case in next three months.  
Rajuk’s lawyer Motaher Hossain Sazu told reporters that the developer had filled up 80 percent of the project land estimated about 1,600 acres at Bakurta and Parabartha of Kaliganj in Gazipur but the court’s order on Monday would suspend the rest of the work until disposal of the matter from the High Court. 
On August 1, the High Court following the writ petition in public interest, filed by BELA, Ain O Salish Kendra and five other rights organisations, stayed all kind of earth-filling and construction works under the project. 
The court had issued a rule on Rajuk asking it to explain in four weeks why the layout plan of the Purbachal New Town Project should not be declared illegal, arbitrary and against public interest.
The court had also asked the authorities and Rajuk to explain why they should not be directed to protect and conserve the unique ecology and forest, wetland and cultivable land.
On August 20, the Appellate Division vacation chamber judge, in response to a petition filed by Rajuk, stayed the High Court order and directed Rajuk to file a regular petition in two weeks seeking permission to appeal against the High Court order.     
Failing to file the regular petition by the time, the stay order will automatically be vacated, the Appellate Division said.
Writ petitioners’ lawyer Fida M Kamal submitted that the project, which had no environmental clearance from the environment department, should be declared illegal, arbitrary and against public interest. (source